It’s Kind of a Funny Story

©2010, Focus Features

Zach Galifianakis (left) and Keir Gilchrist (right) star in writer/directors Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck's IT'S KIND OF A FUNNY STORY, a Focus Features release. Photo credit: K.C. Bailey.

And these children that you spit on
As they try to change their worlds
Are immune to your consultations
They’re quite aware of what they’re going through.

- from Changes by David Bowie, as quoted in John Hughes’ The Breakfast Club

Craig (Keir Gilchrist) can’t quite articulate why he feels he might be suicidal—not outwardly, anyway.  In his imagination, he knows exactly why.  Between girl troubles, entrance exams for a NY prep school, disconnection from his parents—George (Jim Gaffigan), a workaholic father and Lynn (Lauren Graham), his simpering mother—and other transient issues, he feels his walls closing in.

Craig checks himself into a psychiatric hospital. Realizing how serious some of the mentally ill really are, he begins to have second thoughts and tries to check himself out.  Instead, his psychiatrist, Dr. Minerva (Viola Davis), insists that five days minimum is a mandatory evaluation period before he is deemed not a danger to himself.  Instead, he meets the varied residents of the ward in 3 North, including Bobby (Zach Galifianakis, in the only role in which I’ve ever been able to tolerate him), a schizophrenic black man, an acidic Hasidic (he did a little too much LSD) with hypersensitivity to sound, an agoraphobic Muslim (Bernard White) and Noelle (Emma Roberts), a cutter whom he comes to adore.  They all encourage him toward his real passion: art.  I chose the word “passion” over “talent” here because talent has become too associated with the concept of marketability, undermining the purpose of pursuing one’s passion—to have fun.

As I mentioned, Chris has a father whose “client crises” are of greater importance than time with his own son that he can never get back.  This isn’t an uncommon or new theme, nor should my observation of that fact be considered criticism.  Steven Spielberg had a recurring theme of separated, divorced or divorcing parents, reflecting what he went through as a child.  E.T. was less about aliens than Elliott’s sense of alienation in a fractured household in the California suburbs.

Among the patients, including Bobby, he learns that he loves to draw, to sing—a rousing fantasy sequence of David Bowie and Freddie Mercury’s “Under Pressure” in which Craig overcomes stage fright by imagining himself as Mercury, complete with tight pants and microphone stand arm triumphantly raised, upside-down, in the air.

Why is Craig convincing himself that he has to get into that management prep school.  Doesn’t a management prep school run contrary to the fundamental reason why Harvard has no undergraduate business program?  A management degree is useless without experience.  I would know.  But never mind.

Parallel to The Social Network, this film ruminates in relationships, between friends, between strangers, between love interests.  But if I had to choose from the acerbic (read: tactless) wit of Mark Zuckerberg and the deceptively insecure, actually extroverted, Justin Long-patter of Craig, I would choose the latter.  Such kids are deserving of and need our help, compassion and empathy, especially when they’re compelled to hide their symptoms which, in teen circles, make them easy targets for shattering ridicule.

In places the story appears insensitive at a time where teen suicides weigh on the national conscience.  Take, for instance, a peculiarly unconstructive activities coordinator who negatively calls attention to Craig’s “artist’s block” rather than positively encouraging ideas to seed his imagination.  Note the numerous psych ward clichés:  The miscreants, the irrational yeller, the catatonic guy holding a table-tennis paddle, and the silent agoraphobe whose key to unlocking his “awakening” lies with the newcomer.  However, stripping all of that away, genuine moments of discovery exist between modest Craig and inquisitive Noelle a-la Cameron Frye and Sloane Peterson, with a touch of The Breakfast Club mixed in as they evade hospital personnel on an unscheduled outing, as well as between Craig and Bobby during an unscheduled game of hoops.

Given its oddly-timed release, I’m not sure whether the film will be received positively or negatively.  What I do know is that I genuinely like Craig.  He’s a good, honest kid, whose closed system at school tends toward seemingly insurmountable chaos only because, prior to Monday, he hadn’t taken an opportunity to step outside and broaden his world view.  His struggle isn’t really with depression so much as it is with identity.  But it is important to note how one can trigger the other.  It is equally critical that we don’t downplay the necessity of treatment in clinical depression.  Some may infer that the film suggests that depression can be treated in a week by finding a girl who likes you, but that conclusion ignores everything else going on in the film.  Toward the ending, Craig tells us five days in the ward didn’t magically solve all his problems but he’s begun the path to self-improvement.  Treatment, drug therapy and a lifestyle change (the three factors necessary for successful recovery from clinical depression) are all present in the film—the third just beginning.

Not long ago, there was a rash of suicides of young adults in Japan, pressured by their academic system and work-oriented culture in which 16 hour days were not uncommon.  We’ve already seen the deleterious, even fatal impact that peers can have on others toward whom society already discriminates.  Teens of all persuasions, intellectual, sexual or otherwise, have enough problems navigating the mess of emotions and social interactions lacking the tact and wisdom furnished by experience.  We need to remove some of that weight from their shoulders and get involved as parents, guardians, mentors, role models, friends, to encourage treatment at the earliest signs of trouble and also show them that life will move beyond high school and people (most of us) will change with time.  Transient problems aren’t best served by irrevocable solutions.

Footnote: I’ve often chided today’s youth because of their apparent identity crisis.  I’m beginning to understand what incubated them.  My generation had a preoccupation with status acquisition through career achievement.  We contributed to the polarized view that you’re either a rock star or nothing.  The “Economic Pearl Harbor” this philosophy resulted in has only compounded the problems with which we’ve saddled them.  We were too busy climbing our ladders to teach them to be well-rounded human beings, rather than just more employable ones.  Consequently, hipsters borrowed their identity from superficial perspectives on decades past, and their techno-commerce brethren borrowed their callous sociopathy from our narcissism.  We failed them, and created a generation of stressed out, manic-depressive children misguidedly trying to imitate adults who behave like children.


It’s Kind of a Funny Story • Dolby® Digital surround sound in select theatres • Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1 • Running Time: 91 minutes • MPAA Rating: PG-13 for mature thematic issues, sexual content, drug material and language. • Distributed by Focus Features

Dolby and the double-D symbol are registered trademarks of Dolby Laboratories.

Dinner For Shmucks

© 2010 DW Studios LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Left to right: Steve Carell plays Barry and Jemaine Clement plays Kieran in Paramount Pictures/DreamWorks Pictures/Spyglass Entertainment's comedy, DINNER FOR SHMUCKS. Photo credit: Merie Weismiller Wallace

Paul Rudd plays Tim, an analyst at an ailing financial services firm.  To survive, they need to woo an eccentric Swiss heir, Müeller (David Walliams doing Val Kilmer’s best Eurotrash impression from The Saint), in order to stay afloat.  Tim’s girlfriend, Julie (Stephanie Szostak), appears to be taking interest in yet another European eccentric, shock artist Kieran (Jemaine Clement)—a deranged cross between Mick Jagger and Michael Hutchence.  After making the proposal to win Müeller’s business, his boss, the unimaginatively-named Lance Fender (Bruce Greenwood), invites Tim to a “Dinner for Winners.”  Every month, Fender’s top employees are to bring a guest—the stupidest person they can find.

Enter Barry (Steve Carell), an IRS agent with a penchant for dead mice. That is, he practices taxidermy in his spare time.  Tim runs him over and quickly realizes that Barry isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed.  I hate using clichéd metaphors, but there you go.  Barry meticulously crafts scenery, dresses up the mice, and makes photo albums that tell a story.  There’s no question the man is not an idiot.  He’s very talented, but lacks the filters of common sense and tact.

Barry undermines Tim’s relationship with Julia, his job and the better part of his life for a couple of days at best.  All seems to implode at a brunch scheduled with Müeller.  He wants to meet Julia, who has just dumped Tim after Barry mistook her for a stalker.  Naturally, this sets the stage for an awkward meeting which, as the rules of bad filmmaking generally state, will result in a twist.  The Müellers are just weird enough to buy into this bizarre situation.

The film is peppered with humorous vignettes sure to score laughs with multiplex audiences, but it disrespects its own subject by regarding Barry from the vantage point of Tim.  Wouldn’t it be interesting to shift perspective, flip the story and tell the third act from Barry’s point of view?  You can sense every director who wants to try this approach, but fails because they’re afraid of disconnecting with the audience that instinctively laughs at, not with, Barry and his ilk.

The story itself is recycled from numerous embarrassment-themed comedies of late.  As Barry, Steve Carell essentially reprises his role from The 40 Year Old Virgin.  The story regards him as a lovable imbecile, well-meaning to a fault.  But the objective of the story isn’t so much to make us feel bad for Barry as it is to make Tim feel bad, and ultimately have an epiphany about himself.  Unfortunately, this epiphany doesn’t include seeing what a duplicitous, superficial and ignorant woman Julia is.  How can she be a curator of an art gallery and never see what a flake Kieran really is?  Try to figure out what real qualities Julia possesses, but first imagine her as an ordinary woman instead of the lithe, Hollywood-approved beauty that she is.

The film also tests one’s patience for Zach Galifianakis.  Here, he plays Therman, Barry’s even stranger boss, and claims to have some kind of mental power over Barry.  The reason his mental powers are effective, I won’t spoil.  Mr. Galifianakis seemed overexposed the moment The Hangover’s end credits rolled.  Like Michael Cera, he appears to be cast solely for his ability to annoy.

The real standout in this movie is Kristen Schaal as Susana, Tim’s co-worker on the 6th floor.  She provides comic relief from the comic relief.  As an assistant, she’s homely only in appearance but resourceful and funny—the kind of co-worker I would miss if I got that big promotion into the sterile halls of the executive floor.  There’s something unusually attractive about her expressive, large eyes, smile and witty charm.  It’s absolutely unfortunate they didn’t find a way to wrap up her story.  She’s abandoned by the second act.  It’s truly a shame that Tim chooses the well-meaning yet insipid Julia, without having ever given the bright Susana a shot.


Dinner For Shmucks • Dolby® Digital surround sound in select theatres • Aspect Ratio: 2.39:1 • Running Time: 114 minutes • MPAA Rating: PG-13 for sequences of crude and sexual content, some partial nudity and language. • Distributed by Paramount Pictures.

Dolby and the double-D symbol are registered trademarks of Dolby Laboratories.

Youth in Revolt

Michael Cera stars in YOUTH IN REVOLT, directed by Miguel Arteta.  Photo by: Bruce Birmelin / Dimension Films, 2009

Michael Cera stars in YOUTH IN REVOLT, directed by Miguel Arteta. Photo by: Bruce Birmelin / Dimension Films, 2009

On the surface, Youth in Revolt seems to be the perfect hipster coming of age movie; with it’s obscure pop songs, absurdist fantasy sequences, and Michael Cera.

However, the original novel possesses substance lost in the movie adaptation. Having read the 499 page book (which took me many hours of unrelenting focus and determination, due to its perspective of a horny insecure teenager. In truth, I‘m still half of that, you can figure out which part, so it wasn‘t entirely a stretch.), I felt bored throughout the movie and also very assured since they seemed to cast this movie from within my own mind (except for Zach Galifianakis, who seemed kind of stubby. I was hoping for a burlier dude; maybe a young John Goodman or Jeff Bridges on a binge). Jean Smart, who is becoming the go to harried out of touch hipster mother (previously in the same role in Garden State), plays Nick’s single emotionally wrought mother here. Fred Willard plays Nick’s old hippy neighbor Mr. Ferguson, willing to help house any refugees at will. Steve Buscemi is Nick’s dad. Newcomer Portia Doubleday (who is incredibly toned down characteristically here) plays Nick’s ideal mate, Sheeni Saunders.

When reading the book, I felt Michael Cera was born to play this role. In the mid-90′s when the book came out, that type of character was certainly unheard of. A well read, old fashioned and astute teenager as the main protagonist?! How can this be? While movies like Scream, and TV shows such as Dawson’s Creek and every other Kevin Williamson-style movie had come out, none had a character as unique as Nick Twisp. Those male protags were all very masculine down deep and certainly were not as astute as Mr. Twisp. (Some may argue that Dawson among others, was kind of a movie nerd, this is not true. His favorite director was Steven Spielberg, who—no offense to Mr. Spielberg—is the go to for many a young film director who isn’t trying hard enough.)

Mr. Twisp’s type was still on the bench waiting to be signaled in. It would take almost another decade before young nerdy men could be thought of as the new ‘masculine,’ and they would certainly require a soundtrack that would herald something at the opposite end of the music spectrum, other than Frank Sinatra to be their generational sound. Which is why the choice of Michael Cera is so perfect yet so odd. He is certainly not the type that so many moviegoers will relate to on the surface. If any hipster likes Frank Sinatra, it’s as a joke of sorts, not a way of life. They laugh and admire his misogyny, alcoholism, and natural ability. They would never look up to him as an idol in the same manner like Nick does. Mr. Cera, however fits the look and mental capacity for someone like Nick. In reading the book, all I could hear was Michael Cera. His is Nick Twisp. However, Mr. Cera is, for many of the hipster fad, a generational spokesmen of sorts—the modern Ferris Bueller.

While Mr. Bueller, and in some way, Mr Broderick, had it all together, Michael Cera is vastly different. He is a personality and a type cast character actor known for playing men who are desperately trying to put and keep it together. The nerd movement took over pop culture and made it more or less ok to be unattractive, badly dressed and overall geeky or odd. In their conglomeration of modern, American pop culture, you could be smart and vaguely attractive, if you were the real thing. However, the book was written before hipsters became vogue. Nick is a throwback to a simpler time, when being a hipster meant you were smooth, cool and well read. A playboy hipster as it were.

In this production, Nick Twisp falls in love with Sheeni Saunders—a bookish, attractive girl. While she breaks the theoretical hipster rule of unattractiveness, she more than fulfills it with her endless knowledge of foreign languages, movies and novels. She bridges the gap of ideal pinup and knowledge young woman. (It’s a perfect dream, really.) She is Nick’s literary equal, and he believes they are meant for each other. Alas, her heart is owned by another (isn‘t it always in the Romeo and Juliet romances?), the ever classically masculine, yet academic (and somewhat effeminate) Trent.

Trent is the typical American protagonist, but in our presented reality, he is the outsider. He is the ‘nerd’ trying to fit in in the hipster dominated society by writing abstract poetry (which every good poet knows shows a sincere lack of talent) on the side, while he windsurfs daily and speaks a foreign language. A true hipster is, at the heart, self-aware, and proudly wears badges of childhood previously regarded as embarrassing. The once shameful nerd now wears his oversized glasses or tacky Christmas sweaters lovingly made by a parent or relative.

And that’s what we learn the value of Nick Twisp. Hipsters see their own chronology in Nick. Their search for identity throughout many years of awkward adolescence results in completion and acceptance.


Youth In Revolt • Dolby® Digital surround sound in select theatres • Running Time: 90 minutes • MPAA Rating: R for sexual content, language and drug use. • Distributed by Dimension Films

Dolby and the double-D symbol are registered trademarks of Dolby Laboratories.

YOUTH IN REVOLT Red-band Trailer Is Here (NSFW)

 

From Dimension Films: YOUTH IN REVOLT is a coming-of-age comedy that puts a fresh and outrageous stamp on a tale of adolescent obsession and rebellion. Starring Michael Cera (also of the Oscar® winning film, Juno, and Superbad) and based on the acclaimed novel by C.D. Payne, YOUTH IN REVOLT is the story of Nick Twisp – a unique, but affable teen with a taste for the finer things in life like Sinatra and Fellini – who falls hopelessly in love with the beautiful, free-spirited Sheeni Saunders (Portia Doubleday) while on a family vacation. But family, geography and jealous ex-lovers conspire to keep these two apart. With Sheeni’s encouragement, Nick abandons his dull, predictable life and develops a rebellious alter ego: Francois. With his ascot, his moustache and his cigarette, Francois will stop at nothing to be with Sheeni, and leads Nick Twisp on a path of destruction with unpredictable and uproarious consequences.

Up In The Air

Natalie Keener (Anna Kendrick, left) and Ryan Bingham (George Clooney, right) in UP IN THE AIR, a Paramount Pictures release. Photo Credit: Dale Robinette. Copyright © 2009 DW STUDIOS L.L.C. and COLD SPRING PICTURES. All Rights Reserved.

Natalie Keener (Anna Kendrick, left) and Ryan Bingham (George Clooney, right) in UP IN THE AIR, a Paramount Pictures release. Photo Credit: Dale Robinette. Photo Credit: Dale Robinette. Copyright © 2009 DW STUDIOS L.L.C. and COLD SPRING PICTURES. All Rights Reserved.

“I feel like the people I worked with were my family and that I died,” says one of countless employees laid off by Ryan Bingham (George Clooney) of Career Transition Counseling, an intermediary hired to administer employee layoffs on behalf of corporate cowards.

The nomadic Mr. Bingham lives in his carry-on—with rollers, very important; on average, thirty-five minutes are wasted going through check-in. A frequent flyer on the edge of racking up ten million miles, he knows this and everything else necessary to travel lightly and quickly. He’d be disappointed in my sister and her entourage of matching luggage.

The silver-tongued protagonist also does the lecture circuit. He enlists a backpack as a shallow metaphor for baggage with which we weigh down our lives. “Drink some gingko and let the photos burn,” the guru preaches. Suffice it to say, the man is a stranger to his own relatives. Says the eldest sister when inviting him to Wisconsin for his youngest sister’s wedding, ” I know how you are about… doing things… for others.”

His manager, Craig Gregory (Jason Bateman), drops the first shoe; all the field reps are being reeled in and will be distributing layoff notices via videoconference. That it’s terribly impersonal and rude is beside the point. Bingham will no longer be pampered in every VIP lounge, by every airline concierge service. This is the end of life as he knows it.

Into Mr. Bingham’s solitary existence, two women enter. First, the technocrat, pint sized Natalie Keener (Anna Kendrick), whose idea it was to take agents off the field and into the cubicle. She’s the other shoe… a fastidious woman so incapable of relaxing and appreciating the scenery of life. Bingham seems offended by this more than any of the logistical changes to his job.

Second, the escape artist, Alex Goran (Vera Farmiga), also a traveler whose profession is never revealed. She’s as obsessed with the perks of elite traveler status as Bingham. Succinctly, she summarizes, “Think of me as yourself… with a vagina.”

Alex gets next to his skin—even if only for 40 minutes between connecting flights—while Natalie crawls under it. Mr. Bingham seizes the opportunity to take Ms. Keener on the road to enlightenment. You’d think this is one of those stories where the protagonist realizes he really needs to be with his diametric opposite. Life is rarely like that.

Director Jason Reitman, son of Ivan Reitman (Ghostbusters, Stripes), shows his chops in this analogue to his feature debut, Thank You For Smoking, also about a dedicated pitch-man with a conscience-devouring job. In both cases, the fundamental nature of the protagonist never changes—pragmatic and true. What does emerge, however, is a more balanced understanding of himself and his place in the world.

It’s truly cliché to observe that George Clooney often channels Cary Grant. It’s also true that he’s maturing into the same charismatic, older leading man that Grant became. He’s the affable man at the mixer every woman wants to meet, and every other man wants to be. The consummate bachelor, Mr. Clooney reflects just enough comfort in his own skin without teetering into arrogance, quietly amused by life’s idiosyncrasies. There’s a great deal of Marcello Mastroianni in him.

Vera Farmiga lends credibility to the experienced, 40-ish career woman. But the standout, surprisingly, is Anna Kendrick. Known to my readers as the girl who recites awfully self-aware dialogue in Twilight, here she redeems herself with a performance that runs the gamut—uptight analyst, ironically relationship-dependent girlfriend, drunken harlot.

Take a stab at which character will ultimately become more endearing. In a simpler film, the final shot would cut to Ryan dropping everything to be with Alex. In a hip film, he’d break from that and end up with Natalie. In a smart film, he would stay true to his loner self, gaining the knowledge and wisdom he needs from the experience of being with both women.

This is an intelligent film with many thoughtful scenes. Note his younger sister Julie’s (Melanie Lynskey) subdued expression of guilt when Bingham politely accepts that another uncle will be giving her away. Watch Bingham and Goran dancing at a tech party conference they crashed. A wide shot, it feels as though we are eavesdropping, but on Mr. Clooney and Ms. Farmiga. Not that they broke character, but I think they are the characters. At this stage in the actors’ lives, they put on no ostentatious displays to conceal insecurities. They appear to genuinely enjoy the moment. This appeal is a setup, to be upended later. I won’t reveal how.

The more tender, introspective situations of this film remind me, tangentially, of John Hughes’ bittersweet Planes, Trains and Automobiles. Mr. Hughes treated his characters, however absurd their predicaments, seriously and respectfully. This is where the senior Reitman’s experience with Second City alums, may have rubbed off on the younger. Consider a dialogue with Keener, Goran and Bingham, in which the elders impart their wisdom of relationships upon the recently-jilted Keener. The scene is less about pontificating to Keener than it is about discovering their own needs, yet it manages to transform all parties involved. That was Hughes’ gift… the ability to relate, in small ensemble productions, a universal moral about interpersonal connections. Here, the younger Mr. Reitman more intimately defined the antihero from Thank You For Smoking. I look forward to chapter three.

Up In The Air opens today in select cities—exclusively at the AMC Northpark 15 in Dallas. The film opens nationwide December 25.


Up In The Air • Dolby® Digital surround sound in select theatres • Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1 • Running Time: 109 minutes • MPAA Rating: R for language and some sexual content. • Distributed by Paramount Pictures

Dolby and the double-D symbol are registered trademarks of Dolby Laboratories.