<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edge of Darkness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinemalogue.com/2010/01/29/edge-of-darkness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2010/01/29/edge-of-darkness/</link>
	<description>I went into this movie expecting to hate it and, for the most part, I did.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubin Safaya</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2010/01/29/edge-of-darkness/comment-page-1/#comment-58671</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubin Safaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemalogue.com/?p=2329#comment-58671</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;George:&lt;/strong&gt;

As Editor and Publisher, I have final say on all content.  My decision to edit was based purely on aesthetics and substance rather than politics.  Shortly after I published the review, I read it again.  That sentence seemed a non-sequitur.  I cut it out purely to make the review flow better because I didn&#039;t really find any other instances in the film of noteworthy social commentary on which to construct a meaningful argument.

In addition, some critics felt obliged for obvious reasons to comment on Mel Gibson&#039;s public image.  I am not so much interested in the lives of actors.  I try to keep reviews about what&#039;s up there on the screen.  While it&#039;s tempting to use that line as a springboard for a thesis on Mr. Gibson&#039;s penchant for unhinged machismo in his roles and films, that has little to do with the analysis of the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>George:</strong></p>
<p>As Editor and Publisher, I have final say on all content.  My decision to edit was based purely on aesthetics and substance rather than politics.  Shortly after I published the review, I read it again.  That sentence seemed a non-sequitur.  I cut it out purely to make the review flow better because I didn&#8217;t really find any other instances in the film of noteworthy social commentary on which to construct a meaningful argument.</p>
<p>In addition, some critics felt obliged for obvious reasons to comment on Mel Gibson&#8217;s public image.  I am not so much interested in the lives of actors.  I try to keep reviews about what&#8217;s up there on the screen.  While it&#8217;s tempting to use that line as a springboard for a thesis on Mr. Gibson&#8217;s penchant for unhinged machismo in his roles and films, that has little to do with the analysis of the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Hayduke</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2010/01/29/edge-of-darkness/comment-page-1/#comment-58670</link>
		<dc:creator>George Hayduke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemalogue.com/?p=2329#comment-58670</guid>
		<description>Why was the following statement cut out of the original review?  It originally appeared right after the &#039;R rating&#039; comment.



&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s also an incongruous, recurring theme of one or another character saying, “Everything’s illegal in Massachussetts”—perhaps a thinly-veiled reference to same-sex marriage rights in the state.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



I saw the movie, and was looking for a reference online to the &quot;Everything&#039;s illegal in MA&quot; line, and Google still has it cached.   I personally didn&#039;t connect it to same-sex issue.  It does look however that you or someone caved to the PC Police on this edit.  Geez.

-GH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was the following statement cut out of the original review?  It originally appeared right after the &#8216;R rating&#8217; comment.</p>
<blockquote><p>There’s also an incongruous, recurring theme of one or another character saying, “Everything’s illegal in Massachussetts”—perhaps a thinly-veiled reference to same-sex marriage rights in the state.</p></blockquote>
<p>I saw the movie, and was looking for a reference online to the &#8220;Everything&#8217;s illegal in MA&#8221; line, and Google still has it cached.   I personally didn&#8217;t connect it to same-sex issue.  It does look however that you or someone caved to the PC Police on this edit.  Geez.</p>
<p>-GH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

