Friday, May 18, 2012

The Twilight Saga: New Moon

November 20, 2009 by Rubin Safaya · 8 Comments 

KRISTEN STEWART stars as Bella Swan and TAYLOR LAUTNER stars as Jacob Black in THE TWILIGHT SAGA: NEW MOON.  Photo Credit: Kimberley French

KRISTEN STEWART stars as Bella Swan and TAYLOR LAUTNER stars as Jacob Black in THE TWILIGHT SAGA: NEW MOON. Photo Credit: Kimberley French

So rarely in cinema has romance revolved around two more detestable characters than the pernicious Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) and Edward Sullen—er, Cullen (Robert Pattinson). The film adaptation of the second chapter in Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight series catapults us headlong into two hours and ten minutes of abjectly ponderous territory with the first of Bella’s many nauseating voice-overs, “These violent delights have violent ends.”

The cribbed material, Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, lay squarely next to Bella’s head as she wakes up from the first dream sequence, as if she’d attempted absorption by osmosis because eloquence isn’t her forte. The climactic sequence is telegraphed to anyone with a sixth grade reading level who so much as tangentially heard of the Bard’s famous tragedy even if only by way of pop culture references. So preposterous is the comparison, especially given that the closest anyone comes to dissecting Shakespeare is when her teacher asks a question about iambic pentameter. If you paid absolutely zero attention in class, that’s the one thing you’d remember about Sir William.

Then, just as Bella is throwing herself a pity party for her birthday, Edward enters the picture—cue teenage girls swooning. The entrance is so hammy—shot in slow motion, Edward looking not so much cool as constipated and squinty-eyed—that the slug line might have read, “The dashing Edward flamingly sauntered across the schoolyard parking lot.” Rock Hudson is rolling over in his grave.

The romance scenes, so devoid of charisma I became not apoplectic but epileptic with rage, are filled with stilted, pedestrian dialogue, “The only thing that can hurt me is you.” The entire film seems to consist of three thoughts, cycled ad nauseum: Don’t leave me. I can’t live without you. Make me a vampire. Juggle these three sentences for two hours and replace a word occasionally with another monosyllabic word, maybe two syllables if you’re adventurous, and you’ve just seen the entire movie without shelling out a single dollar.

When things come to blows between the Black clan, who aren’t so much werewolves as they are computer generated furries (if you have to look “furries” up, spare yourself and don’t), and the Cullens, even the third figure in the love triangle, Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner’s shirtless musculature), tries to push Bella away only to end up concealing her from Edward who cannot hear her thoughts. It would perhaps be helpful if she had any thoughts to hear.

Ultimately, this leads Edward to his Shakespearean conclusion—almost. His ultimate commitment to emo self-loathing is thwarted, mostly because he spent too much time running in slow motion so the rest of the family could catch up and dissuade him. Bella meets Jane (Dakota Fanning exhibiting greater intensity in one glowering look than Kristen Stewart throughout the entire film), the most powerful of a group of vampires known as the Volturi. It doesn’t immediately occur to Bella to offer her immunity as a potential asset to their clan. Instead, the entire scene descends into a good, old-fashioned brawl not unlike an action film-within-the-film, titled Facepunch, which Bella and friends had seen several scenes prior.

Yes, the most appallingly self-aware film in recent memory, another scene has Bella and a friend exiting a zombie flick. Not only might you collapse in paroxysms of laughter when her friend calls the zombie movie “self-referential,” but your irony meter should shatter as she bemoans the movie’s consumerist message next to the film’s poster in front of which sits a strategically-positioned Burger King bag. Director Chris Weitz should be forced to fall on his sword in a written apology to George A. Romero for his feeble attempt at falsely inflating New Moon by the only means possible, cutting down competing genres.

The cinematography borders on the ridiculous. Wide shots of Jacob and his pack mates fifty yards from the lens lack depth of field or depth perspective to heighten the tension of their arrival. Badly-timed jump cuts to uncorrelated angles of an actor’s face only disorient the viewer without any apparent need for emotional affect. A hand-held shot in the cafeteria is pointlessly unstable. Did the DP get confused and think he was shooting 2012? A two-shot of Bella and a friend walking side by side isn’t even focused properly. Finally, in a complete failure of imagination, a passage-of-time shot dollies around Bella over and over for minutes while we count two entire months pass by. We get it, she’s paralyzed with sadness. So am I.

What on Earth do these two self-absorbed parodies of teenagers see in one another? Edward has been around for almost 110 years and, he argues, no one is more special to him than the self-centered tease of a girlfriend he, in relative terms, has only just met? Who are they kidding? If I knew a friend in merely his thirties who felt that way about such a despicable woman, I’d tell him to have his head examined. Edward should have taken a cue from Connor MacLeod in The Highlander and used his time to amass dynastic wealth so he could get out more, travel a little, date interesting women throughout the ages.

Bella is cruelly manipulative, repeatedly playing one family against another as Jacob and clan become surrogates after the Cullens skip town because Dr. Carlisle Cullen (Peter Facinelli) isn’t aging and townspeople begin to wonder. Edward spends ninety-nine percent of the film looking and feeling morose, often going entire conversations without once making eye contact with Bella. So drowned in one-dimensional emo self-pity is the film that it made me want to slash my wrists.


The Twilight Saga: New Moon • Dolby® Digital surround sound in select theatres • Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1 • Running Time: 130 minutes • MPAA Rating: PG-13 for some violence and action. • Distributed by Summit Entertainment

Dolby and the double-D symbol are registered trademarks of Dolby Laboratories.

Comments

8 Responses to “The Twilight Saga: New Moon”
  1. Envy says:

    Love your review. Hit the nail on the head, and cracked me up.

  2. Rachel says:

    Perfect review- what about the parts where we all lean forward to hear what Edward’s muttering?

  3. Alice says:

    I think your review is right on. The first film was better. Pattinson and Stewart were better in it. Hardwicke managed to get some sexual tension and chemistry out of Edward and Bella. She felt the story in ways Weitz couldn’t even begin to understand. I would never hire Chris Weitz to shoot a romance. He has no clue. What they did to Edward in New Moon (bad hair, bad make-up, bad dialogue, bad wardrobe) was unforgivable.

  4. Julia says:

    Let’s face it, the movie isn’t intended for ‘us’ and by us I mean, people older than 15.

    It’s not ground breaking, it’s not clever – it’s simply a teenage girls fantasy. Why is it popular? Well, in a time when ‘romance’ generally means having drunken sex at some party with some guy who forgot to use his acne cream, the concepts in the movie probably seem quite appealing. It’s ‘chaste’, it’s pretty clean and it’s…well, romantic. Sorta. It’s almost stupid for an adult to comment about this film as though they were expecting it to be brilliant – it’s like dissecting Sesame Street. It’s not for us, it has it’s own target audience and that target audience is pleased. In a few years, they’ll probably laugh about it – that’s what I do when I think about the time I was a Dawson’s Creek fan.

  5. Heather says:

    Sadly Julia, I have to disagree with you on one and only one point. People older than 15 (must to my shock and dismay) happen to be avid Twilight fans, of both the book and this horrid, horrid movie. And by people older than 15, I mean 16 -19 year olds (they happen to be either in my Youth Group or in my class).

    I do agree though that dissecting this movie is like taking apart something meant for children. Well, because it is meant for tweens and teens with very little idea of what a true romance really is (in both life and literature). I agree and it’s embarrassing for me to be lumped into the generation this book and movie is intended to appeal to.

    But oh well, to each his or her own (because as I am slowly finding, some malees actually watch this movie and liked it….).

    I just have to sit out two more years and smile and agree with more reviews just like this one on the other two movies that shall be adapted from the books.

    Here’s hoping time passes quickly.

    (And for the record, I am 18)

  6. Maya says:

    I’m a 15 year old girl.And no,I don’t enjoy neither the books or the films. I’ve read all the books without any bad judgment before and quit reading it at New Moon. And as for the film(s), the best thing was definitely The Volturi. It just a few minutes but it’s totally save the whole film from “really bad” level to “just bad” level.Anyway, like the review said.

    “The entire film seems to consist of three thoughts, cycled ad nauseum: Don’t leave me. I can’t live without you. Make me a vampire.”

    I wanna see what will happen to Eclipse and Breaking Down, and how come Chris Weitz doesn’t get his Razzie nomination this year?

    And my mom’s friend actually loves this saga.Guess that’s the proof to what Heather said.

  7. ann says:

    Of course this film was bad. The books provide nothing to work with and the films are intended to be what the manga/anime world refers to as “fan service”. That is to say, gratuitous on the lowest possible level, and self-referential.

    To the discussion about the target audience I want to add that a dismaying number of women who are the parents of teens (or are old enough to be) are passionate fans of the “Twilight” series. Also, I can recall at least four separate occasions where I’ve been out and about (the store, the vet’s office, etc.) and overheard conversations about these books, one adult reccomending them to another, where the excitement centered around the fact that their under-12 daughter (neice,etc.) was devouring the books. My own daughters have assured me that they know plenty of girls 9-12 who love these books. This is so appalling, from so many aspects, I can’t even decide where to start talking about it, but Bella’s codependent behavior would probably get the ball rolling nicely.

    My daughters and their circle of friends consider the Twilight phenomenon dismaying and baffling, so as some of you said above, not all teen girls love it. The movies provide a tidy source of spoofing and satire, and for that I can almost forgive them being the horrible angst-fests that they are.

Write Us

Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately.
By clicking the "Submit Comment" button, you agree to the Terms of Use.
All comment spam is reported to the spamvertized URL's upstream ISP & common blacklists, e.g. Spamhaus.