<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hangover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinemalogue.com/2009/06/05/the-hangover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2009/06/05/the-hangover/</link>
	<description>I went into this movie expecting to hate it and, for the most part, I did.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubin Safaya</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2009/06/05/the-hangover/comment-page-1/#comment-59210</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubin Safaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemalogue.com/?p=639#comment-59210</guid>
		<description>That the man was a Chinese stereotype had nothing to do with his being naked and in a car trunk... I think most people probably understood that but, just to be fair I corrected the punctuation to make my meaning clearer.

As far as reviewers being &quot;idiotic, boorish, curmudgeon&quot;... If you&#039;re so certain we&#039;re all like this, then why are you reading any of us?  Probably because you&#039;re not really reading us at all.  The only line you&#039;ve referenced (while ignoring my overall conclusion which was positive) comes from the excerpt posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10010667-hangover/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rottentomatoes.com&lt;/a&gt;.

To surmise that you haven&#039;t actually read my review would be a safer bet than wagering that Ke$ha keeps a fly-swatter handy.  Let&#039;s add another stereotype: The lazy, attention-deficit, barely literate American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the man was a Chinese stereotype had nothing to do with his being naked and in a car trunk&#8230; I think most people probably understood that but, just to be fair I corrected the punctuation to make my meaning clearer.</p>
<p>As far as reviewers being &#8220;idiotic, boorish, curmudgeon&#8221;&#8230; If you&#8217;re so certain we&#8217;re all like this, then why are you reading any of us?  Probably because you&#8217;re not really reading us at all.  The only line you&#8217;ve referenced (while ignoring my overall conclusion which was positive) comes from the excerpt posted on <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10010667-hangover/" rel="nofollow">Rottentomatoes.com</a>.</p>
<p>To surmise that you haven&#8217;t actually read my review would be a safer bet than wagering that Ke$ha keeps a fly-swatter handy.  Let&#8217;s add another stereotype: The lazy, attention-deficit, barely literate American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Sense Of Humour</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2009/06/05/the-hangover/comment-page-1/#comment-59209</link>
		<dc:creator>No Sense Of Humour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemalogue.com/?p=639#comment-59209</guid>
		<description>&quot;a horrible effeminate Chinese man stereotype naked in a car trunk&quot; 

Yup. That&#039;s the typical Chinese stereotype: Effeminate, naked, trunk. The reviewer is also steroetypical: Idiotic, boorish, curmudgeon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a horrible effeminate Chinese man stereotype naked in a car trunk&#8221; </p>
<p>Yup. That&#8217;s the typical Chinese stereotype: Effeminate, naked, trunk. The reviewer is also steroetypical: Idiotic, boorish, curmudgeon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

