<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hills Have Eyes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/</link>
	<description>I went into this movie expecting to hate it and, for the most part, I did.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-59182</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 04:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/#comment-59182</guid>
		<description>I had the misfortune of actually wanting to see this in theatre&#039;s and have been scarred by what I witnessed ever since. Horrifically violent and depraved, I would call this snuff rather than horror.

But what it lacked in reasonable decency it made up for in true feelings of terror. I&#039;ve read some positive reviews that gave it good marks, but for the strictly horror/terror buff; a sentiment I agree with to limited extent. I felt that it was an interesting film overall, but personally would have preferred less grotesque and disturbing violence (especially towards women). I suppose it&#039;s a perverted insight into a visceral, demented, and primitive human nature. Certainly wouldn&#039;t recommend it, unless you&#039;re really, really, really, really, REALLY into horror movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the misfortune of actually wanting to see this in theatre&#8217;s and have been scarred by what I witnessed ever since. Horrifically violent and depraved, I would call this snuff rather than horror.</p>
<p>But what it lacked in reasonable decency it made up for in true feelings of terror. I&#8217;ve read some positive reviews that gave it good marks, but for the strictly horror/terror buff; a sentiment I agree with to limited extent. I felt that it was an interesting film overall, but personally would have preferred less grotesque and disturbing violence (especially towards women). I suppose it&#8217;s a perverted insight into a visceral, demented, and primitive human nature. Certainly wouldn&#8217;t recommend it, unless you&#8217;re really, really, really, really, REALLY into horror movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Sensitive</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-58738</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Sensitive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/#comment-58738</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. This movie is a worthless piece of garbage of the worst kind. I have seen many many crappy, disturbing movies, like Cannibal Holocaust, I spit on your grave...etc...etc.. but this one was devoid of anything good at all. What&#039;s worse is there are people in the world that love movies like this. It got itself a sequel after all. I haven&#039;t bothered to watch it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. This movie is a worthless piece of garbage of the worst kind. I have seen many many crappy, disturbing movies, like Cannibal Holocaust, I spit on your grave&#8230;etc&#8230;etc.. but this one was devoid of anything good at all. What&#8217;s worse is there are people in the world that love movies like this. It got itself a sequel after all. I haven&#8217;t bothered to watch it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-58682</link>
		<dc:creator>kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/#comment-58682</guid>
		<description>I completely agree - I had the misfortune of catching a scene of this movie on TV last night - it was the part with the eldest daughter that you refer to. Needless to say it&#039;s horrifying, and somehow it seems incredibly disrespectful to me. I&#039;m not used to feeling this way about any piece of creative work or art, but these kinds of movies seem to cheapen real suffering, and real trauma. I don&#039;t understand how people can stand watching it - there&#039;s nothing of value to take away, nothing good to be learned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree &#8211; I had the misfortune of catching a scene of this movie on TV last night &#8211; it was the part with the eldest daughter that you refer to. Needless to say it&#8217;s horrifying, and somehow it seems incredibly disrespectful to me. I&#8217;m not used to feeling this way about any piece of creative work or art, but these kinds of movies seem to cheapen real suffering, and real trauma. I don&#8217;t understand how people can stand watching it &#8211; there&#8217;s nothing of value to take away, nothing good to be learned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary T</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-58575</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemalogue.com/2006/03/10/the-hills-have-eyes/#comment-58575</guid>
		<description>Very well put and accurate. I agree with everything said in this review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put and accurate. I agree with everything said in this review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

